Guide for Scopus indexed journals 2023 easy to publish

After years of rejection, failed experiments, and a newly developed addiction to caffeine and turning into a complete night owl, a researcher has finally made a scientific breakthrough in the lab. Well, the inevitable next step is to get his/her research published in a high-profile SCOPUS indexed journal with an impeccable impact factor value. Even the thought of doing so, however, can seem nauseating to many, causing them to give up their hopes of having the word about their extraordinary findings spread to the world at large, completely quashed. 

Many research authors turn to shortcuts in a bid to lessen the perceived strain that having a research paper published in a top SCOPUS indexed journal can have on them. While the existence of such shortcuts is pure fallacy, this article offers three ideas on how one can make the task of having a research paper published in a SCOPUS journal of their choice much easier by addressing – 

• the essence of research publication (particularly in the case of SCOPUS publications);
• meticulously revising and editing a manuscript before publishing to ace the review process;
• possible ways to accelerate publication in SCOPUS indexed journals.

• Understanding The Essence Of Research Publication May Help In Facilitating Easy Publication

• Publishing Philosophy
  • Each researcher is guided by his/her own approach to the research itself. 
  • Research philosophy can be thought of as the development of the research hypothesis, its knowledge, and its nature. 
  • The hypothesis is seen as a preliminary statement of reasoning, but it is based on the knowledge and ideas of the person who philosophizes that have arisen as a result of intellectual activity. 
  • Some famous philosophers have also claimed that research is driven by assumptions. 
  • This implies that different researchers may have different assumptions about the nature of truth and knowledge and its acquisition. 
  • The philosophy of scientific research is, therefore, a method that, when applied, enables scientists to transform concepts into knowledge in the context of research. 
  • There are four main trends in research philosophy that are distinguished and discussed in the works of many authors – 
    • positivist research philosophy, 
    • interpretative research philosophy, 
    • pragmatist research philosophy, and 
    • realist research philosophy.

• Positivist Research Philosophy
  • Positivist research philosophy asserts that the social world can be apprehended objectively. 
  • As per this research philosophy, scientists are objective analysts and, on this basis, dissociate themselves from personal values ​​and work independently.

• Interpretive Research Philosophy
  • The total opposite of the research philosophy mentioned above is the interpretive research philosophy – when a researcher states that based on the principles, it is not easy to understand the social world. 
  • As per the constructs of the philosophy of interpretive research, the social world can be construed or defined purely by subjective means. 
  • The greatest attention here is given to comprehend the ways in which people experience the social world. 
  • The philosophy of interpretive research is based on the principle that the researcher plays a specific role in observing the social world. 
  • According to this research philosophy, research is based and depends on the interests of the researcher.

• Pragmatist Research Philosophy
  • The pragmatist research philosophy deals with facts. It asserts that the choice of research philosophy is primarily determined by the research problem. 
  • In this research philosophy, practical outcomes are considered important. 
  • Moreover, pragmatism does not belong to any philosophical system and to any reality. 
  • Researchers have freedom of choice. 
  • They are at liberty to opt for the methods, techniques, and procedures that best meet their needs and their scientific research objectives. 
  • Pragmatists do not view the world as an absolute unit. 
  • The truth is what is actually in action; it does not depend on the mind not being subject to reality and on the dualism of the mind.

• Realist Research Philosophy
  • The realist research philosophy is based on the principles of positivist and interpretive research philosophies. 
  • The philosophy of realist research is based on assumptions necessary for the perception of the subjective nature of the human. 
  • Attend an online international conference 2025 if you wish to know more about this in detail. 

• Joining The Conversation
  • For every researcher, publishing their work for the advancement and general knowledge of the scientific community is as critical as carrying out the research itself. 
  • Why is this so? In general, science just wouldn’t work if all researchers kept their findings to themselves. 
  • Educating oneself from the successes and failures of others is a vital step in facilitating the growth of science and technology in our constantly evolving world. 
  • By publishing new work, researchers not only show the world what they’ve accomplished but also open the door to novel ideas, applications, and points of view they may never have thought of. 
  • In particular, the scientific literature offers a wealth of knowledge that often functions as a jumping-off point for researchers who are about to embark on a new subject or idea.

• Publishing Is Not Just For Studies That Succeed But Also For Those That Fail
  • Even if the result of a researcher’s findings is not what they expected, they should go ahead and publish it. 
  • Some of the world’s most significant inventions were discovered by inventors who set out with something else in mind. 
  • These accidents helped create solutions to problems that no one knew existed. 
  • A researcher’s “failed” experience may also have alternative applications in a completely different or unknown field. 
  • Along the same lines, researchers shouldn’t be afraid to ask questions and look at an old problem in a new light. 
  • So-called experts in a given field often overlook minute details that they take for granted. 
  • Sometimes a fresh look is enough to ask the naive question that breathes new life into a project.

• Building One’s Portfolio Of Published Works
  • While the idea of ​​sharing ideas for the sake of science is a nice feeling, there are, of course, less romantic motives behind the post.
  • Resume building, especially in academia, is a strong motivator to post early and often. 
  • In fact, depending on a researcher’s current career stage or the types of jobs they want to pursue, this may be their only reason to publish.
  • The number of journals and publications 2025 on a resume is often used as a tool to measure the position of researchers in relation to each other. 
  • Whether or not it provides an accurate assessment, this harsh reality places enormous stress on today’s researchers, which can often stifle their creativity or lead to substandard publications. 
  • While it can sometimes seem like a numbers game, it’s crucial to realize that a few high-quality articles in reputable, peer-reviewed, SCOPUS indexed journals are likely to have a greater impact than a plethora of mediocre work that no one will likely ever read.

• Publishing To Be The First 
  • One other major motive behind publishing early and often is the urgency to publish one’s work in order to avoid coming in second.
  • Reading a recent paper by another researcher on the same problem one is about to solve (or maybe one is even a day late in the publishing process) is a researcher’s worst nightmare. 
  • Despite the fact that this unfortunate situation is often unavoidable, there are ways to alleviate it. 
  • Instead of waiting to have all the pieces together for one comprehensive document, consider publishing a communication of preliminary findings that sets out one’s intentions for future work. 
  • This approach can be specifically helpful when working on a hot topic in current literature. 
  • While there are other ways to protect one’s intellectual property, such as patents and invention disclosures, these processes are often complicated and time-consuming and may not be appropriate, depending on the nature of one’s job.

• Being Persistent
  • That said, publishing in high-impact, SCOPUS indexed journals is not always an easy task. 
  • Perseverance is the key. Researchers shouldn’t be put off by reviewers’ opinions of their work. 
  • If their article is rejected, they should carefully consider the comments and suggestions from reviewers to contemplate whether or not this journal is still the appropriate forum for their work. 
  • If so, they should be open to modifications or additional work that might help their manuscript fit its mould. 
  • If not, they should find a journal with a slightly different reach/readership that may be better suited to their particular field or topic.

• Considering The Big Picture
  • Whatever a researcher’s motivation for posting is, they shouldn’t lose sight of the big picture. 
  • They should be passionate, persistent, and open to change and new ideas. 
  • Taking ownership of one’s own work for career advancement and personal recognition is always a rewarding feeling, but making a meaningful and lasting contribution to science is really what it’s all about. 
  • Register for the next 2025 educational conference to get advice on this very subject from veteran research authors with decades of publishing experience. 

• Revising & Editing A Manuscript Before Submission Could Facilitate Easy Publication
  • Before submitting a revised article to an editor, it is important to respond to comments from all reviewers and the journal editor.
  • Often when revising a document, it is easy to introduce inconsistencies and other issues that did not exist in the original document. This brief checklist is intended to help anyone resubmit an article for publication.
  • The following issues may not occur in one’s revision, but it is good to check all of the following, particularly if multiple authors have been involved in revising the manuscript.
  • The following should serve as a checklist to help with revising and resubmitting one’s manuscript to be considered for publication – 

• Responding To All Editorial Queries
  • It is important to ensure that each question they have addressed has been answered in a response letter to reviewers and in the paper itself, if applicable. 
  • Find, register, and participate in any top upcoming conference in 2025 to learn about the best manner in which to respond to editorial queries. 

• Consistency Throughout The Manuscript
  • The issues detailed below are easy to overlook –
    • Active/Passive Voice 

Researchers should be aware of when to use active or passive voice.

• Person 

Researchers should be aware of first and third-person sentencing in academic writing.

• Verb Tenses 

Using the right verb tense is crucial in academic writing. 

• Parallelism

Research authors should know how to maintain a parallel structure in their writing.

• Microsoft Word can help researchers solve some of the most common inconsistencies, such as the use of abbreviations, hyphenation, spacing, etc. 
• Other common inconsistencies that need to be corrected in manuscripts include structure (section titles, font style, and size), vague language, and citations.

• Thorough Adherence To The Journal’s Formatting Guidelines
  • Research authors will do themselves a world of good by getting insights into formatting issues and learning about some of the biggest challenges formatters face. 
  • They can also learn more about style guides and get to know about some of the most popular formats used by academic publishers. 
  • Participate in an international conference in 2025 if you wish to learn about the most common publishing guidelines and how to easily abide by them.

• Carrying Out A Thorough SpellCheck
  • It’s not that hard to spot typographical errors when revising a document.
  • Nevertheless, there are tools out there (such as Grammarly) that help automate this process. 
  • The ‘Spell Check’ tool on Google Docs is also pretty dependable. 

• Getting Colleagues & Other Research Authors To Vet The Revised Manuscript
  • Journals often require that all authors approve the final version of a manuscript for publication. 
  • Researchers should learn more about authorship regarding this issue and other ethical implications regarding authorship.

• Responding To The Comments of Reviews In The Most Professional Manner Possible
  • After making sure that the revisions meet their reviewers’ expectations and that their revisions are consistent throughout the document, research authors should reflect on their responses to the peer reviewers and how they can write persuasively.
  • Research authors can also seek the services of professionals from the publishing industry by signing up with an organization such as IFERP. 
  • Download the IFERP app to avail of these services today.

• Accelerating The SCOPUS Publication Of A Manuscript Could Also Ease The Process
  • Research is often a slow process, requiring meticulous design, optimization, and duplication of experiments. 
  • By the time a researcher has accumulated enough data to write a manuscript, they will probably want to have it published as soon as possible. 

• Prompt publication can speed up the dissemination of results, reduce the likelihood of being picked up, and allow for a quicker return to the lab to work on the next study. 
  • Whether a researcher is currently experimenting or writing, the following tips can help increase their publishing speed – 

• Focussing On The Data At Hand
  • Designing key experiments with the release in mind, including appropriate controls and layout, reduces time wasted repeating work to get more complete or presentable data. 
  • Also, researchers should consider recording their data early, especially because this process can become more time-consuming and daunting as weeks and months continue passing by since the collection of the data. 
  • IFERP’s team of publication experts offers young and veteran researchers alike all the assistance they require with formatting figures or creating custom illustrations, especially when they’re pressed for time.

• Beginning The Writing Process Early On
  • Even if a researcher doesn’t have a full set of experiences, they can start writing their article right away. 
  • The background/introduction section, which is usually based on previous research, lends itself particularly well to pre-writing. 
  • Planning, structuring, and writing the materials and methods section when the protocols are still fresh in one’s mind can also help quicken the entire manuscript preparation process.

• Writing Succinctly 
  • Unfortunately, publishing a well-designed study with important implications can be hampered by the lack of clear writing.
  • Editors and reviewers, especially, may have difficulty understanding content and may even have negative biases against poorly written manuscripts, causing rejection to be the more likely outcome. 
  • This is a specific barrier to publication for non-native English speakers. 
  • Those researchers who require help with their writing should consider either asking their colleagues to contribute to their manuscript or avail of IFERP’s professional assistance.

• Paying Attention To The Journal’s Publishing History
  • Checking both a SCOPUS journal’s preferred home style (guidance will be available on their website) and paying close attention to issues of grammar, syntax, spelling, etc., helps immensely. 
  • It is very tedious to work on a poorly written paper, and by irritating reviewers, researchers increase the chances of rejection. 
  • A poorly written article gives the impression that the author doesn’t care.

• Recognizing When A Manuscript Is Ready & When It’s Time For Submission
  • If a researcher already has a lot of data but is still conducting experiments, they should ask themselves if their research can be split into two separate stories. 
  • This approach will allow these initial studies to be published quicker, even before subsequent ones are completed.

• Having A Peer-Review Done Right Before Publication
  • Making use of IFERP’s pre-publication peer-review service, which provides peer review prior to journal submission, can further increase publishing speed. 
  • Researchers can also simply get feedback from their colleagues on the strength of their article. 
  • With these comments in hand before submitting, researchers can avoid some of the objections of journal reviewers.

• Picking The Most Ideal Journal For One’s Work
  • To increase the likelihood of article acceptance, researchers should try to select a journal whose scope matches their research objective. 
  • By talking to their colleagues, reviewing their own list of references, and browsing journal websites and recent tables of contents, researchers can easily accomplish this. 
  • Researchers can also consider reviews and publishers that promote a faster time from submission to decision. 

• Maintaining Professionalism At All Times
  • Researchers should always be polite, fair, and professional throughout the process in their dealings with editors, editorial assistants, reviewers, etc. 
  • It is not wise to acquire a reputation as a prima donna before the start of one’s career.

• Learn From Past Mistakes
  • Researchers should take some time and try to remember how their previous manuscript preparation process went. 
  • They should contemplate if they –  
    • remembered to include all readings in the results section;
    • did justice to the discussion section and mention all relevant studies; 
    • remembered to include the limitations of their study;
    • presented digital readings as text;
    • included contributions from all co-authors.
  • Researchers should prepare a checklist that they can go through while preparing their manuscript and avoid the slip-ups you committed earlier. 
  • Those researchers who are first-time authors can also ask their friends and colleagues (who, of course, should have some experience in publishing their own research papers) for such a checklist.  

• Getting A Hang For Editing
  • Editing is the magical process that will turn a researcher’s draft into a submission-ready manuscript. 
  • Once they have gathered all the relevant data in their draft research paper, they should take a break. 
  • Yes, take time so they can look at their paper with a fresh perspective and spot any gaps in logic or flow.
  • However, it is not easy for the writer to be the editor of his own newspaper. 
  • Therefore, researchers might benefit from having their articles edited with the help of a professional manuscript editing service such as IFERP. 
  • Not only will their article be edited by experts in their field of research, but it will also be edited to meet the journal’s requirements (word count, formatting, etc.). 
  • IFERP’s editing pros help improve the readability, clarity, and tone of the text.

• Not Neglecting Proofreading 
  • Problems such as grammatical errors, inconsistencies, and missed words can reduce the quality of a researcher’s hard work.
  • Thorough proofreading is required to eliminate spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors, inconsistencies, formatting errors, etc. 
  • Also, for an error-free article, researchers need to proofread again and again and again. 
  • It would be helpful to keep a checklist of mistakes they often make and look for them specifically. 
  • They can also outsource proofreading to one of the many online proofreading services. 
  • IFERP’s professional proofreaders are trained to scrutinise manuscripts with a fine-toothed comb.